<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SalahDin Rezk Blog</title>
    <link>https://salastro.github.io</link>
    <description>Essays and technical writing from SalahDin Rezk.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 08:31:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://salastro.github.io/feed-physics.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>

    <item>
      <title>Is Area a Vector or Scalar?</title>
      <link>https://salastro.github.io/#is-area-vector-or-scalar</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://salastro.github.io/#is-area-vector-or-scalar</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Physics</category>
      <category>Physical Models</category>
      <category>Vectors</category>
      <description>In grade 10 we had a discussion with our mechanics and mathematics teacher about how should area be described. He insisted that area is a scalar, while some of us were totally convinced that it should be a vector. I, personally, was on the scalar side since vectors always have a direction, and area can not have such a characteristic. The only vector related to area is the normal to its surface, which is looked to me as a completely separate thing from area itself. It may be attached to it, but it is not what defines it.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
